Task 1
Two extinct types of archosaurs at the order level are:
There is evidence that some dinosaurs were ectothermic, such as their huge size and the lack of characteristics like insulating fur or feathers in many species, which suggests a reliance on external temperature regulation.
The Rocky Mountains in western North America have a complex geological history spanning hundreds of millions of years. They were formed by tectonic events, mostly the North American Plate colliding with the Pacific Plate.
Laramide Orogeny (Late Cretaceous to Early Paleogene): Mountains were built in the Rockies during the Laramide Orogeny 70–40 million years ago. Compressional pressures uplifted and folded sedimentary rock strata, forming the rough mountain scenery we see today.
Tectonic Plate Interaction: The Pacific Plate subducted beneath the North American Plate, creating the Rockies. The Earth's crust buckled and folded because to this subduction event's enormous pressure and heat.
Due to their complicated geology, the Rockies have several rock kinds. These include igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks including sandstone, shale, and limestone generated under tremendous pressure. Additionally, there are extensive granitic intrusions in the region.
Here is an image illustrating the rugged terrain and diverse rock types of the Rocky Mountains:
Figure 1 Rocky Mountains with rugged, towering peaks
Figure 2 Geological map of the Rocky Mountains region to visualize the types of rocks found there
Figure 3 Geological cross-section of the Rocky Mountains
The Coast Range's rocks are diverse due to volcanic activity, sedimentary deposition, and tectonic forces. Basalt, andesite, sandstone, and shale are included. Due to its dynamic geology, the region has large glacial and alluvial deposits.
Here is an image illustrating the volcanic nature of the Coast Range, featuring Mount St. Helens:
Figure 4 volcanic nature of the Coast Range
Sub-order |
Example Dinosaur |
Lifestyle Characteristics |
Age Range (Ma) |
Theropoda |
Tyrannosaurus rex https://www.britannica.com/animal/tyrannosaur |
- Carnivorous |
68-66 Ma |
Sauropoda |
Brachiosaurus https://www.britannica.com/animal/brachiosaur |
- Herbivorous |
154-153 Ma |
Ornithopoda |
Parasaurolophus https://kids.britannica.com/students/article/Parasaurolophus/312897 |
- Herbivorous |
76-73 Ma |
Ankylosauria |
Ankylosaurus https://www.britannica.com/animal/Ankylosaurus |
- Herbivorous, heavily armored |
68-66 Ma |
Stegosauria |
Stegosaurus https://www.britannica.com/animal/stegosaur |
- Herbivorous, with distinctive double row of back plates |
155-150 Ma |
Ceratopsia |
Triceratops https://www.britannica.com/animal/Triceratops |
- Herbivorous, with horned frill and facial horns |
68-66 Ma |
Organism |
Phylum |
Ecosystem Position |
Feeding Style |
Ottoia |
Annelida |
Infaunal |
Carnivore |
Anomalocaris |
Arthropoda |
Nekton |
Carnivore |
Vauxia |
Porifera |
Epifaunal |
Filter Feeder |
Marella |
Arthropoda |
Epifaunal |
Herbivore |
Sedimentary rocks in different parts of Canada were deposited under varied conditions due to factors such as tectonic activity, changes in sea level, and variations in the Paleozoic era's climate.
Group |
History (Time Range) |
Morphology (Valve Shape, Symmetry, Hinge Type, Pedicle) |
Orthida |
Ordovician to Permian |
- Valve Shape: Generally rounded to oval |
- Symmetry: Biconvex (both valves are convex) |
||
- Hinge Type: Usually with a simple, straight hinge line |
||
- Pedicle: Attached to substrate via a pedicle through a small foramen |
||
Pentamerida |
Ordovician to Devonian |
- Valve Shape: Pentagonal or five-sided |
- Symmetry: Biconvex (both valves are convex) |
||
- Hinge Type: Typically with dental plates and sockets |
||
- Pedicle: Attached via a pedicle foramen and diductor muscles |
||
Lingulata |
Cambrian to Recent |
- Valve Shape: Linguliform (shaped like a tongue) |
- Symmetry: Inequivalved (one valve is convex, one is concave) |
||
- Hinge Type: Inarticulate, lacking teeth and sockets |
||
- Pedicle: Extends through a pedicle foramen |
||
Strophomenida |
Ordovician to Permian |
- Valve Shape: Variable, but often biconvex or subtriangular |
- Symmetry: Biconvex or subequivalved (valves differ in size) |
||
- Hinge Type: Typically with a simple, straight hinge line or teeth |
||
- Pedicle: Attached via a pedicle foramen and diductor muscles |
||
Spiriferida |
Ordovician to Permian |
- Valve Shape: Variable, often biconvex, with distinctive fold and sulcus |
- Symmetry: Biconvex or subequivalved (valves differ in size) |
||
- Hinge Type: Complex, with teeth and sockets |
||
- Pedicle: Attached via a pedicle foramen and diductor muscles |
||
Rhynchonellida |
Ordovician to Recent |
- Valve Shape: Variable, often biconvex, with a distinctive sinus and fold |
- Symmetry: Biconvex or subequivalved (valves differ in size) |
||
- Hinge Type: Complex, with teeth and sockets |
||
- Pedicle: Attached via a pedicle foramen and diductor muscles |
||
Terebratulida |
Permian to Recent |
- Valve Shape: Variable, often biconvex, with a distinctive loop or spire |
- Symmetry: Biconvex or subequivalved (valves differ in size) |
||
- Hinge Type: Complex, with teeth and sockets |
||
- Pedicle: Attached via a pedicle foramen and diductor muscles |
Task 2
Go outside somewhere near to where you live and find a scene that shows one of the following features: (a) mechanical weathering of a natural rock surface (either an outcrop or a large boulder), or (b) some type of slope failure, or (c) a soil profile (in your yard, or in a place where it’s acceptable to dig a shallow hole and then fill it in). Take a couple of photos, one showing the feature up close and another showing some context so that your instructor can understand the setting. In one of the photos, provide some evidence that you were there when the photo was taken (for example, your hand in the photo with 2 fingers extended, or a piece of paper with your name on it). Include the photos with your assignment and write an explanation describing what you saw.
a.For earthquakes with MW values of 10, 10.5, and 11, we can use the Moment Magnitude Calculator to make educated guesses about the features of the rupture zone. The estimates are as follows:
Magnitude |
Length (km) |
Width (km) |
Displacement (m) |
10 |
12000 |
200 |
300 |
10.5 |
38000 |
200 |
1000 |
11 |
120000 |
200 |
3000 |
b. It's quite improbable that Earth will ever experience an earthquake of magnitude 10 or higher. This is mostly because of how strong rocks are and how thick the Earth's crust is.
An earthquake of magnitude 11 requires various features unique to the planet itself, in contrast to Earth.
The scale of geological processes and the magnitude of energy released during tectonic events are both dependent on the planet's size. In this respect, Earth's size is restrictive.
Lithosphere Thickness: Larger earthquakes can occur when the lithosphere is thin because seismic waves can travel farther. The thickness of Earth's lithosphere is more than that which is required for MW 11 earthquakes.
Earth's rocks would have to have different physical attributes, including reduced strength and higher ductility, to accumulate the stress and strain required for earthquakes of such magnitude.
Greater tectonic motions and seismic energy release are both possible results of a more active mantle convection system.
In essence, a planet would need to be very different from Earth geologically and physically for it to have earthquakes of MW 11. Due to the Earth's geological and structural constraints, earthquakes of that magnitude are extremely unlikely to occur here.
a.
Station |
Location |
Δ North (cm/y) |
Δ East (cm/y) |
Total offset (cm/y) |
ALBH |
Albert Head |
0.25 |
0.56 |
0.61 |
BCOV |
Bear Cove |
0.13 |
0.17 |
0.21 |
HOLB |
Holberg Inlet |
-0.03 |
0.06 |
0.07 |
NANO |
Nanoose |
0.22 |
0.50 |
0.55 |
NEAH |
Neah Bay |
0.56 |
1.03 |
1.17 |
QUAD |
Quadra Island |
0.00 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
UCLU |
Ucluelet |
0.50 |
0.97 |
1.10 |
1.Examples of volcanic hazards:
Type of Event |
Location and Date |
Lava Flow |
2018 Kilauea eruption in Hawaii |
Pyroclastic Flow |
AD 79 eruption of Mount Vesuvius in Pompeii |
Lahar |
1985 eruption of Nevado del Ruiz in Colombia |
Ash Fall |
1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens in Washington |
2. Typical radii from the volcano affected by these events:
Type of Event |
Radius that Can Be Affected |
Lava Flow |
Several kilometers (variable) |
Pyroclastic Flow |
10-30 kilometers or more |
Lahar |
Up to tens of kilometers |
Ash Fall |
Hundreds to thousands of kilometers (downwind) |
3. Potential for property damage and casualties:
Type of Event |
Potential for Property Damage and Casualties |
Lava Flow |
Property damage can be significant; casualties low if evacuation is possible. |
Pyroclastic Flow |
Extremely high potential for both property damage and casualties, especially in populated areas. |
Lahar |
High potential for property damage and casualties, especially in valleys and river channels. |
Ash Fall |
Property damage to infrastructure; potential for respiratory health issues if ash is inhaled in large quantities. |
Metal 1: |
Country |
Production (tonnes/y) |
Reserves (tonnes) |
Cobalt |
Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) |
Approximately 95,000 |
Estimated: 3.4 million |
China |
Approximately 7,200 |
Estimated: 1 million |
|
Canada |
Approximately 3,500 |
Estimated: 230,000 |
|
Metal 2: |
Country |
Production (tonnes/y) |
Reserves (tonnes) |
Lithium |
Australia |
Approximately 42,000 |
Estimated: 2.7 million |
Chile |
Approximately 18,000 |
Estimated: 8.2 million |
|
China |
Approximately 7,500 |
Estimated: 2.2 million |
Concerns about child labour, unsafe working conditions, and environmental harm have surfaced in connection with cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. These issues are especially linked to the artisanal mining sector, which is responsible for a significant share of the country's cobalt production.
Water-intensive techniques used in lithium mining can put a strain on water supplies in nations like Australia and Chile. Ecosystems in the area may also be harmed by the extraction of lithium. Concerns over land use and water rights have been voiced by several indigenous populations.
The environmental and social implications of mining and processing technologies can be reduced by the adoption of best practices by individual enterprises and the implementation of appropriate regulatory frameworks. Given the rising need for these metals in renewable energy technologies, efforts are being made to address these concerns and encourage more responsible mining operations.
The XYZ Municipal Water District, which is a public utility, supplies my home with water. The majority of the water I use comes from lakes and reservoirs, specifically Lake ABC, a large reservoir in our area. The water in this district is purified before being distributed to residents.
Type of Water: Surface water from Lake ABC is the main type of water used.
Threats to Water Quality There are a number of potential threats to the water quality that we have access to. Industrial and agricultural runoff, pollution, and chemicals are all potential threats that could contaminate the lake. Water quality can also be impacted by the presence of naturally occurring organic debris and dangerous microbes. To reduce these dangers, the water district uses rigorous treatment methods like chlorination and constant monitoring.
The effects of climate change on our water supply might be devastating. The amount and quality of water in Lake ABC may be affected by changes in precipitation patterns and higher temperatures. The supply of water for treatment and distribution could be impacted if the lake's water level drops due to prolonged droughts or changing weather patterns. Another way in which rising temperatures exacerbate water scarcity is by increasing evaporation rates.
The XYZ Municipal Water District has taken water-saving measures and looked into diversifying water sources, like investing in groundwater extraction, to deal with climate-related problems. They are also working with regional agencies and keeping a close eye on climatic trends to ensure a steady water supply even as the climate shifts.
In conclusion, Lake ABC is the primary source of my drinking water because it is a surface water. Although there are certain threats to water quality, the municipal water district uses stringent treatment techniques to guarantee that the water is safe to drink. Climate change, however, threatens our water supply's reliability and longevity, necessitating proactive steps to adjust to new circumstances and secure a reliable water infrastructure.
Water pollution is a persistent problem in some First Nation villages in my region. The situation of the Attawapiskat First Nation in Ontario, Canada, is one such instance.
Attawapiskat's water contamination problem is largely caused by inadequate water infrastructure and treatment facilities. The town's water treatment system is outdated and can't handle population growth. Natural contaminants like iron and manganese in local water supplies worsen the problem.
Attawapiskat's water contamination has been a long-standing issue. The water treatment facility will be expanded and renovated, along with distribution and water management upgrades. Local operators have been trained to ensure the treatment facility runs efficiently. In addition, provincial and federal authorities have been consulted about funding infrastructure improvements and long-term solutions.
Despite progress and expenditures, Attawapiskat's water infrastructure is poor. Water quality difficulties remain, therefore households are recommended to boil their water for long periods. Water contamination solutions have been hampered by delays, regulations, and finances. Attawapiskat residents lack potable drinking water despite years of government effort and guarantees.
Attawapiskat is not alone in facing difficulties; many other First Nation communities in Canada have similar problems with water contamination. The process of solving these issues is slow and complicated, but it is underway. This circumstance highlights the critical importance of taking immediate and long-term action, investing in new and upgraded infrastructure, and committing to making sure all Indigenous and remote communities in Canada have access to clean, safe drinking water.
There are good arguments on both sides of the contentious matter of whether or not to continue using nuclear power. Environmental, social, economic, and security concerns all need to be taken into account while forming a judgment on nuclear power.
When it comes to the environment, supporters of nuclear power point to the fact that electricity generated in nuclear reactors releases very little carbon dioxide. Particularly in areas where renewable energy sources encounter intermittency difficulties, nuclear energy can assist address the urgent problem of climate change and provide a reliable supply of electricity.
The disposal of nuclear waste and the possibility of catastrophic accidents are two areas where nuclear power is met with opposition. Many nations still struggle with how to safely store nuclear waste over the long term, despite the dangers it poses to ecosystems and future generations.
Concerns about public safety and acceptance are central to the social context of nuclear energy. Supporters stress the strict safety precautions and regulations that have been put in place to prevent mishaps. They state that nuclear energy can help with energy security and employment creation.
In contrast, skeptics bring to high-profile nuclear disasters like Chernobyl and Fukushima, which had devastating effects on people and the environment. Public criticism and resistance to nuclear initiatives can stem from widespread fear of nuclear accidents.
When it comes to finances, it's important to keep in mind that nuclear power plants often demand large upfront costs and can take years to build. Nuclear power supporters say that once reactors are up and running, they provide a reliable, low-cost electricity source for decades.
The high initial costs and the risk of cost overruns, according to its detractors, make nuclear power less competitive than renewables like wind and solar. Subsidies for nuclear power, they say, might take money away from renewable energy.
Nuclear power raises security issues because to the potential for nuclear materials to slip into the wrong hands or for nuclear accidents to be used maliciously. Modern nuclear facilities, its supporters say, have strong security systems in place to prevent theft or sabotage.
Opponents, however, point to the potential of nuclear proliferation if additional countries adopt nuclear power and the necessity for constant watch. They worry that security safeguards will be weakened because of investments in nuclear energy.
Finally, the future of nuclear power is complex and situation-specific. Challenges connected to waste disposal, safety, affordability, and security cannot be overlooked despite its potential to contribute to a clean energy future and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. To attain sustainability and meet the pressing concerns of climate change, a well-rounded strategy should be taken into account when deciding whether to develop or phase down nuclear power. This strategy should include strong safety measures, appropriate waste management, and an emphasis on diversifying energy sources.
You Also Might Like
Social Science Assignment Help
How to Ace Your Linguistics Academic Paper?
1,212,718Orders
4.9/5Rating
5,063Experts
Turnitin Report
$10.00Proofreading and Editing
$9.00Per PageConsultation with Expert
$35.00Per HourLive Session 1-on-1
$40.00Per 30 min.Quality Check
$25.00Total
FreeGet
500 Words Free
on your assignment today
Get
500 Words Free
on your assignment today
Doing your Assignment with our samples is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....
🚨Don't Leave Empty-Handed!🚨
Snag a Sweet 70% OFF on Your Assignments! 📚💡
Grab it while it's hot!🔥
Claim Your DiscountHurry, Offer Expires Soon 🚀🚀